Obama and Biden first wanted to "evolve" evasively on the GLBT demands that marriage can be between same sex couples. Today, in doing damage control on the Obama Evolution, now he supports gay marriages drawing a bright line in the sand between Obama and Romney.
Now with the evolution changing depending on wind direction, I want to state I am ready to add a great big R in front of evolution the day Congress votes it is in our national interest marriage it is ok for Bob and Bob to be married for several reasons. But especially two big reasons:
1. The United States Constitution's limits to the enumerated powers ensuring states having sovereign rights to govern their own borders and not be subjected to over-reaching big brother's long tenacles interfering in state sovereignity.
2. Marriage is between a man and woman, period-it is not a function under the United States Constitution for any branch of the federal government to state same sex marriages is one of the enumerated functions.
Further, since gay marriage is a function of state soverenity, why did Obama not mention that? This is merely a cheap political gesture and I would suspect this huge error while result in more political theatre as Obama's polling numbers take a quantum hit in the aftermath. Obama's evolution will merely state, hey, that was personal opinion-not my presidential position. Or, some equal political garbage soon to follow.
Obama drew the bright line and clearly his evolution is to Romney's and our national interest's advantage come November 2012. Way to go Obama. Your theories on evolution as POTUS on gay marriage needs to do some more "evolving", again.
Now with the evolution changing depending on wind direction, I want to state I am ready to add a great big R in front of evolution the day Congress votes it is in our national interest marriage it is ok for Bob and Bob to be married for several reasons. But especially two big reasons:
1. The United States Constitution's limits to the enumerated powers ensuring states having sovereign rights to govern their own borders and not be subjected to over-reaching big brother's long tenacles interfering in state sovereignity.
2. Marriage is between a man and woman, period-it is not a function under the United States Constitution for any branch of the federal government to state same sex marriages is one of the enumerated functions.
Further, since gay marriage is a function of state soverenity, why did Obama not mention that? This is merely a cheap political gesture and I would suspect this huge error while result in more political theatre as Obama's polling numbers take a quantum hit in the aftermath. Obama's evolution will merely state, hey, that was personal opinion-not my presidential position. Or, some equal political garbage soon to follow.
Obama drew the bright line and clearly his evolution is to Romney's and our national interest's advantage come November 2012. Way to go Obama. Your theories on evolution as POTUS on gay marriage needs to do some more "evolving", again.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anyone that would like to post solutions to make America a better nation as a guest blog author; or has solutions to fix some of the problems in America, send me an essay to tscherer4@kc.rr.com. Also known as Thomas E. Scherer, your better candidate for United States Congress
Merely remember if I am elected to Congress, you the individual are my boss. PACS, Lobbyists and Special Interest Groups, sorry, but just go away. Americans are tired of the United PACS of America buying and corrupting our congressman and Senators. Our candidate is not for sale.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.